The auction of Mahatma Gandhi’s items

by Amrit Hallan on March 6, 2009

This is the height of stupidity, or may be it is all intentional:

Ambika Soni, even vowed to “enter the auction if required as a last resort.” But in the end, officials decided not to do so, because the Delhi High Court had ordered an injunction to stop the auction in response to a petition filed by the Navajivan Trust, a publishing house that is Gandhi’s legal heir. (Mr. Otis’s items were acquired legally; some of them had been given away by Gandhi himself.)

The Indian government said that news of the injunction was passed to both the auction house and Mr. Otis, but the auction house said the Indian court had no jurisdiction in the United States.

“The government can’t participate because this would be contempt of court,” Prabhu Dayal, India’s consul general in New York, said in an interview on Thursday morning. “This is getting more complicated.”

Now, even a child would know that the Indian courts have no jurisdiction in the United States, so what was the f***ing sense behind filing a petition and getting an injunction to stop the auction? Wasn’t it counterproductive? As Ambika Soni said that the Indian government would even take part in the auction in order to obtain the items belonging to Mahatma Gandhi. Due to this stupid injunction that has no relevance in the US the Indian government could not participate.  I’m not saying that Mallya shouldn’t have won the bid but what if some other person from another country with no emotional attachment had won (I don’t mean to say you have emotional attachment just because you’re an Indian but the chance is greater)? The Indians can sometimes surpass anybody when it comes to being nihilistically proactive.

My thoughts are based on this link.

  • http://www.securitycameraking.com/ securitysystem

    We should save our valuable items.

  • http://roadtokhalistan.blogspot.com/ Mai Harinder Kaur

    Dear Amrit ji,

    I – of course! – havew my own idea about how the disposition of these articles should be handled, but I want to comment on something completely different.

    Speaking as one writer to another, your phrase “nihilistically proactive” is masterful! Congratulations. You should copyright it…or I might use it (in a context of which you would almost certainly disapprove, since we disagree on almost everything.

  • http://www.amrithallan.com Amrit

    Well, Mai, please go ahead and use the expression…in fact I’m intrigued to know how you’re going to use it. When it comes to literary interaction, even if I disapprove, I welcome it.

  • http://rockwebmedia.com/?p=4234 Ways To Safely Purchase At Automobile Auctions | Hobby Cash by RockWebMedia

    [...] The auction of Mahatma Gandhi’s items | Writing Cave [...]

Previous post:

Next post: