Modi Is The Gist of Whatever Is Wrong With The BJP

by Amrit Hallan on December 8, 2007

If the BJP is blamed for being communal then Narendra Modi justifies all the disapprobation. He’s a man the party should have gotten rid of after the Gujarat riots. Just as Sonia Gandhi and her cohorts represent whatever is wrong with the country, he represents whatever is wrong with the BJP; in one way or the other he will cause the party’s downfall.

In his recent speech he doesn’t even pretend to be representing a civilized democracy, and he is rightly being compared to Idi Amin and “Baby doc”. The BJP moronically blames Sonia Gandhi for Modi’s utterances at the rally where he justifies the encounter killing of Sohrabuddin who was blamed for having weapons with him. Later on two police officers were sacked and arrested for organizing the fake encounter. This is what makes it sound like a rogue state of affairs:

“Sonia Gandhi spoke of terrorism. But she has no right to talk of this. Till today, those who attacked Parliament haven’t been sent to the gallows. Congress in Gujarat is raising its voice on the Sohrabuddin issue. But, it should explain to the people what should be done to a man who stored illegal arms and ammunition. You tell me, what should have been done to Sohrabuddin?”

The rally echoed with shouts of “Kill him, kill him.” Modi responded with: “Well, that is it. Do I have to take Sonia Gandhi’s permission to do this?”

Doesn’t this sound like some place in Iraq, Iran or Afghanistan?

I have no sympathy for the likes of Sohrabuddin but you cannot flaunt a state-sponsored murder, justified or not justified. You don’t openly encourage expressions like “Kill him, kill him”.

People like Modi thrive on fear psychosis. It is somewhat same as the way George W. Bush exploits the fear of the Americans of Islamic terrorists to carry out his political and mercantile agendas. Terrorism is a criminal problem, it is a law and order problem, but it is certainly not a communal problem as Modi makes out to be. You attach unnecessary importance to terrorism by painting it in a communal color. To counter terrorism if you have to resort to unlawful tactics such as killing people in fake encounters and instigating riots against the suspected communities, it means your ability to carry out the law has deteriorated. Everybody who lives in our country is an Indian and deserves all the protection an Indian is provided by the Constitution. It doesn’t matter to which community or religion you belong. Similarly protecting people of the state is the fundamental duty of the Chief Minister no matter what community he or she has to protect; he or she cannot just go on mouthing excuses.

As I wrote in one of my previous posts, in order to become a responsible and respected political party the BJP will have to get rid of Narendra Modi before he causes an irreversible damage to the party and to the country.

  • http://ibnlies.wordpress.com Amrit Rao

    Can you xplain how it is communal when he points Shorabuddin…a terrorist.
    When in these days of Muslim Appeasement what do you expect Modi to do.
    Is Muslim Appaeasement ethical?
    If Congress was diving India on Caste, Religion lines he is much, much better atleast he is uniting hinduism

  • RC Sharma

    What should be done with terrorists??

    How can Modi be compared with Idi Amin and Baby doc? They did not have to face MUSLIM terrorism.

    He asked a question and the people, as one man, responded. How is he responsible if people want Sohrabuddins killed summarliy??

    When is the seclar brigade going to feel that the average Hindu, a silent sufferer, has a deep anger against terrorism??

  • Alok

    Yes, you have touched a very tricky issue. True, it is the duty of a chief minister to protect the interest of the people. According to the law also, it is said that if 1000 criminals are left unpunished, its all right but its a sin to victimize and punish an innocent man, who is not guilty of doing anything wrong.

    On the other hand, one needs to act promptly in certain situations. By the time one decides whether a person is innocent or is a terrorist, he will kill thousands of innocent men, women and children. You know, the very same people who are blaming Modi of acting unconstitutionally and killing and innocent man, would have blamed him of inaction, had some incident would have occurred due to Shorabuddin. We come back to what i wrote in my last comment, it is most inappropriate to make such a big issue of something just because its happened against a person of certain community.

    All it shows is that there is a very thin line between following constitution and keeping law and order intact. This is a very serious issue. We need an impartial committee of Parliamentarians, Constitutional experts, eminent personalities of judiciary and other intellectuals to sit together, analyze the whole situation and come up with proper guidelines for those who may face similar situations in the future.

Previous post:

Next post: